TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2002-07 > 1025535252
From: Joe Makowiec <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] 5.02 relationship tags
Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2002 10:54:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <60.2220971a.2a51bfda@cs.com>
At 10:23 AM 7-1-2002 -0400, wrote:
>Since it seems that everyone who responded to my post about having the
>relationship tag print where MOTHER and FATHER are now, was in agreement
>that we would like this feature, how do we go about seeing if it in one
>Bob can implement.
Uh - write him? From a recent post to the list:
Bob Velke <>
>Also is there anyone who would prefer to keep the current MOTHER FATHER
>instead of Mother-Ado or Mother-Stp?
One of the reasons I didn't respond in the first place is that this just
isn't a big issue for me. Where I have adoptees in my database, I also
tend to have an "adopted" tag, so I have a pretty good idea what the
<parent>-<type> tags say.
Joe
--
Joe Makowiec can be reached at:
mailto:
http://makowiec.org/
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] 5.02 relationship tags by Joe Makowiec <> |