TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2002-10 > 1033599630
From: Fran Segall <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Temple vs. Lat/Long
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 19:00:30 -0400
Thanks, Lee. I think that solves a "cleanup" issue for me. Can I assume,
then, that as part of my cleanup of existing places in 4.0d, I can enter
Lat/Long info that's now in the memo field and also use the Temple field for
some other place info that I want to keep in 5.0x when I convert over since
I don't need "Temple" info?
> Lee Hoffman wrote:
> In v4x, the Tag Entry Screen may be used to enter place data including
> either Lat/Long data OR Temple data. There just is not room in the Tag
> Entry Screen to enter both LatLong data AND Temple data. However, the
> place record allows for both fields. Therefore if you wish to have both
> you may enter the one in the Tag Entry Screen and then go to the Master
> Place List, find that place record and then enter the other data in the
> appropriate field.
> So if you select to have the Temple field visible for LDS tags, then the
> "Temple" label will replace the "LatLong" label of the LDS Tag Entry
> Screens and anything entered in that field will be placed in the Temple
> field of the Place Record. All other tags (non-LDS tags) will
> continue to
> have the "LatLong" label and data entered in that field will be placed in
> the LatLong field of the Place record.
> If you happen to forget to change the prompt in v4x
> to allow for the Temple field, you may add it in the Master Place
> List even
> if you have entered a LatLong entry in the Tag Entry Screen. Just go to
> the specific place record and open the Temple field for that record and
> enter the Temple Code.
> In v5x there is enough room to display/enter both the LatLong and the
> Temple data, so there is no prompt option for this.
|RE: [TMG] Temple vs. Lat/Long by Fran Segall <>|