TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-11 > 1036910688


From: Robin Lamacraft <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] was born AT or was born IN?
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 17:15:02 +1030
References: <5.1.1.6.2.20021110111018.02cd6720@mail.internode.on.net>
In-Reply-To: <NGBBIPKEJFMGOAAIANPDCEELIIAA.muskoka@attbi.com>


Hey Dave,

Your ahead of the pack!

What I wrote was a proposal for a new feature - *not a real* feature.

Robin Lamacraft (Adelaide, Australia)

At 22:14 9/11/02 -0800, you wrote:


> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robin Lamacraft [mailto:]
>
> > First, insert some new elements to the Place Output Template :
> >
> > [?AT?] <[DETAILS],> <[CITY],> [?IN?] <[COUNTY],> etc...
> >
>
>Yeah, not perfect but very close to what I'm looking for....
>
>
>
> > In this scheme, the last defined [?prep?] value before a non empty field
> > would be the one that would be output. You could have as many [?prep?]
> > values in the Output Templates as you required. Hence we could get
> >
> > at details, city, county, ...
> > at city, county, ...
> > in county, state, ....
> > in state, country
> > in country
>
>I'm getting ?at? ?in? so I've done something wrong....
>
>
>
>
> > Because they are defined this way, they could be included in the language
> > translation tables.
>
>
>Ah, perhaps this is it... Menu/File/Language is inaccessible. I'm running
>5.04.
>
>Dave Nelson
>
>
>==== TMG Mailing List ====
>Visit the TMG Tips web site <http://www.tmgtips.com>; for items of interest
>to TMG users.


This thread: