TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-11 > 1037057091

From: "Cheri Casper" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Second Post
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 15:25:09 -0800
In-Reply-To: <>

Paul - The first one in the series IS an embedded citation; the second one
is not. I didn't know that there was a caveat about using embedded
citations with the Ibid.


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul E. Lawrence [mailto:]
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:19 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Second Post

By chance are these embedded citations?

At 01:19 PM 11/11/2002 -0800, Cheri Casper wrote:
>I posted a message yesterday and didn't get a response, so I will try
>On generating a report and subsequent endnotes, I have a source that is
>cited twice consecutively; in both instances there is nothing to be added
>the Citation Detail when adding this particular source to a tag. I would
>think that "same source, same [CD]" for generation of Ibid. would treat
>empty citation detail fields as *identical.* It does not appear to do so,
>however. I get the short footnote appearing twice in a row in the
>Is this by design or by fluke? Must the Citation Detail field be populated
>before it is considered to be "the same?" Empty and empty equals "the
>as far as I am concerned.


Paul E. Lawrence

My Lawrence Genealogy web page has moved to the following URL:

Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
Hardy, Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, Towne, Kincaid, and Rose, and others.

User of The Master Genealogist (TMG)

Member of the Roots User Group of Arlington, VA:

==== TMG Mailing List ====
FTST has been released. Check the Wholly Genes web site
<HTTP://>; for more information.

This thread: