TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2002-11 > 1037925875


From: "Paul E. Lawrence" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Married Names
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 18:44:52 -0600
References: <KBEAIKBFMLMBGCJNPHBCIEHGDHAA.dn@pswja.org>
In-Reply-To: <NBBBIDKKPHENIBJNJEBBCEOCHBAA.bob@limitededition-az.com>


If you aren't going to print the married name tag, or if you don't mind
that the sentence reads "Her married name was Jones." you don't have to
enter the given name. The given name is inferred and shows in the PE and
Pick List which for me would be the main reason for using the Name-marr tag.


At 04:53 PM 11/21/2002 -0700, Bob Massengill wrote:
>I lot of people won't use a married name tag - I do. The downside is that
>you need to manually enter her first name. AND, since I don't really know
>many "married names" as fact, I change the sentence "Her married name would
>have been XXXXX XXXXXX."

XXENDSXX

Paul E. Lawrence


My Lawrence Genealogy web page has moved to the following URL:
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~lawrpaul/index.htm

Includes allied surnames of Bumpass, Byerly, Daughtrey, Ford (Faure),
Harper, Harr, Wilhite/Wilhoit. Also researching Burnett, Daniel, McMurry,
Hardy, Hill, Bondurant, Stansbury, Towne, Kincaid, and Rose, and others.

User of The Master Genealogist (TMG) http://www.whollygenes.com/index.htm

Member of the Roots User Group of Arlington, VA: http://www.rootsusers.org/

This thread: