TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2003-01 > 1041962414
From: Bob Velke <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Sort dates, reply to Bob (medium)
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:05:24 -0500
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030107103330.04aa8dd0@mail.whollygenes.com><5.2.0.9.2.20030107091914.00a78210@mail.usroots.com><5.1.0.14.2.20030106234618.04ad18e0@mail.whollygenes.com><5.1.0.14.0.20030106183747.00a4be00@pop.sprynet.com><5.1.0.14.2.20030105184600.059f8c30@mail.whollygenes.com><5.1.0.14.0.20030105083529.009edec0@pop.sprynet.com><5.1.0.14.2.20030104230553.04c7e490@mail.whollygenes.com><5.1.0.14.0.20030104174533.00a38a20@pop.sprynet.com><5.2.0.9.2.20030104104922.0306dec0@pop3.norton.antivirus><5.1.0.14.0.20030104084738.00a27840@pop.sprynet.com><88.21f14548.2b47be9f@aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <5.2.0.9.2.20030107121902.00a72358@mail.usroots.com>
Morgan said:
>Then why not just take a vote, decide what people want, implement it (or
>leave it as is), and be done with it?
That's almost exactly what we did...more than 10 years ago.
But that doesn't mean that everyone understands or agrees. Periodically,
someone asks why.
-Bob
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Sort dates, reply to Bob (medium) by Bob Velke <> |