TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2003-07 > 1058057450
From:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Quaker dates redux( deja vu all over again)
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 20:51:06 EDT
In a message dated 7/12/2003 2:17:11 PM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:
> >[P] was born <[M1]> <([D[)> <[L]> <[M2]>
>
Hi Vic,
there was a typo in the first one I sent.
should read:
[P] was born <[M1]> <([D])> <[L]> <[M2]>
> Umm Patt,
>
> Can you elaborate a little more? I wouldn't be able to set this up as a
> role in the birth tag because that would not address the marriages, deaths,
> etc., and I don't understand how to set it up as an additional tag. Unless
> I make maybe an "Old Style Date" Birth tag, OS marriage tag, OS death tag,
> etc. I hate to be dense, but can you be a little more specific.
Are role doesn't really have to be a role per se. You can use roles to vary
your sentences in a tag.
My regular birth tag has various roles. One of them is Birth-Quak, using the
above sentence. And one of them is Birth-in. I have selected on my reports to
print "at" for place names but when only a state is known I want to use "in"
the my role Birth-in changes the sentence to reflect that.
You can of course also just create another tag for Birth-Quak which if you
have alot of Quaker births for a family you might want to do so that you can see
on the person view that you have the right sentence.
TMG lets you do the same thing alot of different ways.
You would also have to set up a Marriage-quak and Death-quak using the same
type of format.
> Also to anyone interested. I found a CD of the whole set of Hinshaw's
> Quakers for 39.99 US at http://www.genealogical.com/default.asp . I find
> this to be remarkable because a decade ago I tried to but a set in book
> form. They finally located a set in New England that the owner would part
> with for 700.00 US sight unseen. I am not affiliated with these people in
> any way, just know a good deal when I see one.
Thanks for this info. I have a good CD for Pennsylvania meetings that gives
the actual words used which Hinshaw doesn't. I've used Ancestry Quaker info
from Hinshaw but I find it hard to find the info.
Patt
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Quaker dates redux( deja vu all over again) by |