TMG-L Archives
Archiver > TMG > 2004-04 > 1080960731
From: Elizabeth Churchett <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Seeking confirmation of place style/MPL understanding
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 20:52:11 -0600
References: <CLEDKMONADFEACGECFGJCEEBEHAA.lorna.henderson@paradise.net.nz>
In-Reply-To: <CLEDKMONADFEACGECFGJCEEBEHAA.lorna.henderson@paradise.net.nz>
Lorna,
Thank you--exactly what I was looking for.
--Elizabeth
Lorna McIntosh wrote:
>Elizabeth,
>
>For Second Site (SS) look in Strings -> Place Strings and make sure you
>remove the at/in or whatever there
>
>Lorna McIntosh
>Waikanae, NZ
>Family Tree on web at
>http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~hendersonandandrews/
>Rootsweb (http://wc.rootsweb.com) Jump to database LornaHenderson
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Elizabeth Churchett [mailto:]
>Sent: Thursday, 1 April 2004 6:04 p.m.
>To:
>Subject: Re: [TMG] Seeking confirmation of place style/MPL understanding
>
>I think that by selecting the "blank" option for place prepositions in
>all my reports, that should take care of that. None of my places will
>use the default U.S. Standard Place Style that comes with TMG.
>
>Can anyone confirm that?
>
>Also, I notice that in the Data.Places section, SS does not have
>anywhere to specify "at", "in", or blank as TMG does. Will my
>suggestion below work in SS?
>
>Thanks,
>Elizabeth
>
>
>
>==== TMG Mailing List ====
>Send all messages and replies to <>.
>
>
>
>
This thread:
| Re: [TMG] Seeking confirmation of place style/MPL understanding by Elizabeth Churchett <> |