TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-02 > 1107312429

From: Lorna McIntosh <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] ins, ats and ons
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 15:47:09 +1300
In-Reply-To: <>


I can't immediately see why this (using Addressee for Prepositions) upsets
the place index in Second Site - you can pick what place levels you include,
and excluding the Addressee/Preposition seems to work fine.
I have to admit I don't generate my live sites with a place index, but
that's more to do with other issues in my data. A test site I've just
generated to make sure I wasn't talking rubbish above seems just fine.

And yes, I use my custom style of PrepositionInAddressee just fine, apart
from my problems with the Add Person keeping on shifting the preposition
into the Temple field instead.

Lorna McIntosh
Waikanae, NZ

-----Original Message-----
From: Darrell A. Martin [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, 2 February 2005 2:21 p.m.
Subject: RE: [TMG] ins, ats and ons

At 09:47 PM 2/1/2005, Cheryl Chasin wrote:
>I picked up an idea on this list last year that has worked well for me with
>regard to places. I created a custom place style and changed the Addressee
>field to Preposition. That way, given the level of place detail I have,
>how I want the sentence to read, I can select whatever preposition I think
>is best.
>Cheryl Chasin

Hi, Cheryl:

I used this method for quite a while. It worked fine. I gave it up with the
introduction of Second Site's Place Index. I do not choose to have separate
"places" distinguished only by the preposition, which didn't matter before
but does in the 2ndSt Index.


This thread: