TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-02 > 1107390110


From: "Darrell A. Martin" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] ins, ats and ons
Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:21:50 +0000
References: <6.2.0.14.0.20050202011919.02765718@pop.sprynet.com><001201c5097a$5d9d09c0$6701a8c0@LAPTOP>
In-Reply-To: <001201c5097a$5d9d09c0$6701a8c0@LAPTOP>


At 10:55 PM 2/2/2005, Cheryl Chasin wrote:
>Darrell,
>
>I mostly avoid that problem (and it's definitely a problem) by including
>only the county and state place levels in the index. The only drawback I
>can see is that preposition is part of the underlined links on my person
>pages, which looks a little odd, but isn't a major issue. Most of my places
>are county,state anyway, in which case I always use "in" for the
>preposition.
>
>Cheryl Chasin

Hi, Cheryl:

Place index level selection does not affect the Place Information pages. The Place Index pages work out just fine using that approach.

Darrell


Darrell A. Martin
a native Vermonter currently in exile in Illinois
http://www.darrell-martin.net/genealogy/


This thread: