TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-08 > 1123254082


From: "Teresa Elliott" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:01:22 -0500
In-Reply-To: <351F89D30B94074CA4EF76696E56411301B7D9C6@susday234.corp.ncr.com>


If the tag is primary, then TMG doesn't care what the relationship is.

Teresa Ghee Elliott All links start with
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery and then add

Rutherford Co., TN cemeteries: see above

TMG sentence structures: /TMG.html

Descendants of James Edde of Bedford County, TN /EDDE/index.htm


-----Original Message-----
From: Sholder, Kevin L [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 9:54 AM
To:
Subject: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2

All,

In reviewing this report and looking at the ID for the MIN and MAX I
have found that step or adopted children become a part of the age at
first child and age at last child categories. Should it not be only
biological children for this to be accurate? For example I have a
mother that had a "step" child at age 11, I know that age 11 is very
young for children, but because I had a tag for a step child it give a
false / positive result.

Opinions / Comments ?

Thank you for your time,
Kevin L. Sholder



==== TMG Mailing List ====
Send all messages and replies to <>.



This thread: