TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2005-08 > 1123254082
From: "Teresa Elliott" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:01:22 -0500
If the tag is primary, then TMG doesn't care what the relationship is.
Teresa Ghee Elliott All links start with
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery and then add
Rutherford Co., TN cemeteries: see above
TMG sentence structures: /TMG.html
Descendants of James Edde of Bedford County, TN /EDDE/index.htm
From: Sholder, Kevin L [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 9:54 AM
Subject: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2
In reviewing this report and looking at the ID for the MIN and MAX I
have found that step or adopted children become a part of the age at
first child and age at last child categories. Should it not be only
biological children for this to be accurate? For example I have a
mother that had a "step" child at age 11, I know that age 11 is very
young for children, but because I had a tag for a step child it give a
false / positive result.
Opinions / Comments ?
Thank you for your time,
Kevin L. Sholder
==== TMG Mailing List ====
Send all messages and replies to <>.
|RE: [TMG] Statistical Report - Part 2 by "Teresa Elliott" <>|