TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2005-12 > 1135720288
From: "Scott Gomez" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Post Office vs City on Census
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:51:28 -0800
It's not that *particular server* so much, Bob, as it is Verizon's
*address range*. I have a *very* aggressive anti-spam filter system (for
a raft of reasons I'm not about to explain here), and it occasionally
(although increasingly rarely) makes errors. That said, the IP your mail
originated from *is* on some spam-block lists. For any interested, send
me an email, and (assuming it gets thru :-) ) I'll explain in detail the
"whys" of the above statements.
I'll send you a separate reply to the rest of your message off-list,
Bob. Emails from your address to me will no longer bounce.
From: bob gillis [mailto:]
Subject: Re: [TMG] Post Office vs City on Census
I tried to send this message privately to Scott but my message was
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.2.1 Mailbox unavailable. Due to spamming,
this server blocks mail from your IP address (220.127.116.11).
Remote system: dns;mail.petroglyph.crestline.ca.us
Idon't think the Verizon.net is a source of SPAM.
|RE: [TMG] Post Office vs City on Census by "Scott Gomez" <>|