TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2005-12 > 1135720288


From: "Scott Gomez" <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Post Office vs City on Census
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:51:28 -0800


It's not that *particular server* so much, Bob, as it is Verizon's
*address range*. I have a *very* aggressive anti-spam filter system (for
a raft of reasons I'm not about to explain here), and it occasionally
(although increasingly rarely) makes errors. That said, the IP your mail
originated from *is* on some spam-block lists. For any interested, send
me an email, and (assuming it gets thru :-) ) I'll explain in detail the
"whys" of the above statements.

I'll send you a separate reply to the rest of your message off-list,
Bob. Emails from your address to me will no longer bounce.

---
Scott Gomez

-----Original Message-----
From: bob gillis [mailto:]
Subject: Re: [TMG] Post Office vs City on Census

I tried to send this message privately to Scott but my message was
blocked:
Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:

Recipient address:
Reason: Remote SMTP server has rejected address
Diagnostic code: smtp;550 5.2.1 Mailbox unavailable. Due to spamming,
this server blocks mail from your IP address (206.46.252.42).
Remote system: dns;mail.petroglyph.crestline.ca.us
(TCP|206.46.252.42|49110|66.116.71.139|25)

Idon't think the Verizon.net is a source of SPAM.

bob gillis

This thread: