TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-02 > 1140817995


From: Glenn Gilbert <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Settlement difference between admin and exec.
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:53:15 -0800
References: <20060224194343.XMVB1931.ibm60aec.bellsouth.net@MomsLaptop>
In-Reply-To: <20060224194343.XMVB1931.ibm60aec.bellsouth.net@MomsLaptop>


Here is another roll you might want to consider. Personal
Representative. In my mother's will (Florida 2003) she named a "Personal
Representative" to administer her estate. When she passed the attorney
petitioned the probate court for Letters of Administration and in
accordance with her will the court issued a "Letters of Administration"
appointing me as the "Personal Representative" of her estate. In signing
documents, etc, I used either the full designation Personal
Representative or PR after/under my signature.

Glenn Gilbert
http://gilbert-genealogy.info

Teresa Elliott wrote:

>I just trying to decide what roles I need. <G>
>I have a bunch of Estate tags so they are all different.
>Examples are:
>Letters of Administration
>Will proven
>Will (for when it was written)
>Settlement of estate
>Widows Pension
>Accounting of heirs (Gosh I wish each probate had one of these.)
>to name a few.
>
>Teresa Ghee Elliott-IBSSG
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cheryl Freeman [mailto:]
>Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 8:04 AM
>To:
>Subject: RE: [TMG] Settlement difference between admin and exec.
>
>Hi Bob,
>When I created the administration tag, I was just starting to implement
>roles and created a separate tag for administration - because I hadn't
>thought it all the way through. I've almost finished cleaning up things I
>hadn't thought through <G> and will probably fix this shortly, adding the
>administration roles to the probate tag.
>
>My sentences are pretty basic but are:
>
>Adm-Estate:
>Dec-Intestate - [:CR:][:CR:]Administration was granted for the estate of
>[R:Deceased] <[D]> <[L4],>< [L5],>< [L6],>< [L7]><. [R:Administrator] was
>appointed administrator><. [M1]>
>
>Heir: [:CR:][:CR:][W] was named as an heir in the estate of [R:Deceased]
><[D]> <[L4],>< [L5],>< [L6],>< [L7]>. <[M0]>
>
>Administrator: [:CR:][:CR:][R:Administrator] was appointed administrator for
>the estate of [R:Deceased] <[D]> <[L4],>< [L5],>< [L6],>< [L7]>. <[M0]>
>
>[:CR:][:CR:][R:Adm-Application] petitioned for administration of the estate
>of [R:Deceased] <[D]> <[L4],>< [L5],>< [L6],>< [L7]>. <[M0]>
>
>My probate tag has the role of Executor in place of Administrator, and
>Dec-Testator in place of Dec-Intestate - with corresponding sentences.
>
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: bob gillis [mailto:]
>Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 7:04 AM
>To:
>Subject: Re: [TMG] Settlement difference between admin and exec.
>
>
>
>
>Cheryl Freeman wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi Teresa,
>>
>>Executors were named by the testator in their will. In the case of someone
>>who died intestate, someone (creditor, potential heir, etc) requested the
>>court to administer the estate. Letters of Administration were drawn up,
>>
>>
>and
>
>
>>an administrator was appointed. I have separate tags for probate and
>>administration. The process isn't that different, but my roles and
>>sentences differ. Probably could have put them all on a single tag, if I'd
>>thought it through first. <G>
>>
>>
>>
>I think that administration and execution both come under Probate. The
>former is appointed by the court and the latter is named by the testator.
>
>and Teresa Elliott wrote:
>
>
>
>>When I set up my estate tags, I created roles for executors, but now I am
>>finding some of them mention administrators. What is the difference
>>
>>
>between
>
>
>>the two roles, and should I have both for an estate tag.
>>
>>
>
>I agree that you should have both roles. But how does you Estate Tag differ
>from the Probate Tag?
>
>bob gillis
>
>
>
>
>
>
>==== TMG Mailing List ====
>Send all messages and replies to <>.
>
>
>==== TMG Mailing List ====
>Send all messages and replies to <>.
>
>
>==== TMG Mailing List ====
>Send all messages and replies to <>.
>
>
>
>

This thread: