TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2006-06 > 1150297004


From: Lee Hoffman <>
Subject: RE: [TMG] Unnamed child
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:56:44 -0400
References: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAALWFRs1YvmdCsrz+6CF/ha3CgAAAEAAAADu9ObhC9hNGpXwvLadTI9sBAAAAAA==@sbcglobal.net><200661410038.348095@Terry3>
In-Reply-To: <200661410038.348095@Terry3>


Terry Reigel wrote:
>On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 07:20:50 -0400, Sholder, Kevin L. wrote:
>
> >
> > This uses the "em dash" found in character map as <ATL> +
> > 0151.
>
>Interesting, Kevin. I've been using a superscripted underscore:
>
>[SUP:]___[:SUP]?[SUP:]___[:SUP]
>
>Never thought to use the em-dash. That's simpler. :-) I suppose teh
>en-dash would work as well. I'll have to test that.

Two en-dashes are normally used to create one em-dash when the
em-dash character is not available. MS/Word (and I think
WordPerfect) will (in certain cases) automatically convert two
en-dashes to an em-dash when typing in the program.


Lee Hoffman/KY
TMG Tips: <http://www.tmgtips.com>;
My website: <http://www.tmgtips.com/lhoffman>;
A user of the best genealogy program, The Master Genealogist (TMG)


This thread: