TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2006-08 > 1155218021
From: Steinar Vissebraaten <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Question
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:53:41 +0200
At 15:39 10.08.2006 Thursday, Terry Reigel wrote the following:
Thanks for the reply.
So my sentence is to complicated for TMG. OK.
Then your solution is what it should be. I have
no problem then to make different sentences with
different rolls. I was just hoping it could be
done with only on. As the M4 and M5 refer to the
2 witness occupation. I could also write this
directly into the tag each time - this would be better I suppose.
To use the M4 within the bracket of the sentence
first part I get a problem so what I created was
working ok except it is always printed if no
input too. I wanted to avoid that. I'll have to
look into it deaper or as suggested make another
tag for marriage with the witness as separated from the first marriage tag.
>On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 15:09:34 +0200, Steinar Vissebraaten wrote:
> > I have a marriage tag like this:
> > [:CR:][:CR:][:TAB:]<[M1]><[P]> ble [D] <[A]> gift med
> > <[M2]>< [PO]><[AO] ><[PARO]><i [L1],><i [L4].> Forlovere
> > ved giftemålet var <[M4]>< [R:Witness1]> og <[M5]><
> > [R:Witness2]><, [M3]>
> > How can I make the last part
> > Forlovere ved giftemålet var <[M4]>< [R:Witness1]> og
> > <[M5]>< [R:Witness2]>
> > not showing if the fields are empty?
>You cannot make it dependant on any but the nearest variabel:
><Forlovere ved giftemålet var [M4]>
>That means if M4 is empty and the others are present it will not
>appear. I doubt that is what you intend.
>I think Tom's suggestion of different Roles is the only way to do what
Genealogy from Nes and Flå parish in Hallingdal.
For NESBOOK volume II & III we need all kind of
info - estimate release time 2006 !!!
Steinar Vissebråten, N-3540 Nesbyen.
Phone:+47 32068733 - Mob. +47 90693540
|Re: [TMG] Question by Steinar Vissebraaten <>|