TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2008-05 > 1209838567


From: "Rae Jean" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Citation reference code proposal
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 13:18:04 -0500
References: <mailman.1142.1209625312.18909.tmg@rootsweb.com> <481A1928.4040608@nm.net><00a901c8ad42$c5df1f40$939fe204@Notebook> <000801c8ad43$387cdba0$a97692e0$@net><00f201c8ad46$beb2e450$939fe204@Notebook><000a01c8ad47$537774c0$fa665e40$@net>


In my original message (to which you replied) I suggested ADDING a surety
value code to those that exists now (12DPM) -- the suggestion would
incorporate a value for embedded citations -- so the NEW surety value codes
could become 12DPME (the E represents EMBEDDED citation).
Then the surety code could be used to designate an embedded citation.
A citation could still be excluded.

We can not do this now -- it is a proposal.
I think you are confusing excluded citation with embedded citation.
Rae Jean


----- Original Message -----
From: "Teresa Elliott" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 12:58 PM
Subject: Re: [TMG] Citation reference code proposal


Didn't test that part. Does it do it now, or not? IF the citation is in the
list, but excluded I mean.

Teresa Ghee Elliott
--http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~rutherfordcemetery/
My genealogy blog
--http://generationsgoneby.wordpress.com/


-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf
Of Rae Jean
Sent: Saturday, May 03, 2008 12:54 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Citation reference code proposal

Did you read the part about adding to surety code values....
Rae Jean

This thread: