TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2010-08 > 1282794643


From: "Cheryl Freeman" <>
Subject: [TMG] Wish List includes custom relationship tags - was Regardingmarried names
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:50:43 -0500
References: <005f01cb43b2$8b534140$a1f9c3c0$@acm.org> <00a301cb43db$c3502760$49f07620$@net> <020401cb43f6$18c831a0$4a5894e0$@com> <4C7491E2.2070907@gmail.com> <021101cb4410$2327d690$697783b0$@com><001801cb4483$ba858c30$2f90a490$@net>
In-Reply-To: <001801cb4483$ba858c30$2f90a490$@net>


Thanks Teresa, and now you have given me a new item for my wish list.
Custom relationship tags! Oh, the possibilities! :)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [mailto:] On
> Behalf Of Teresa Elliott
> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 1:31 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [TMG] Regarding married names
>
> If we could "like" a TMG list post, this one would get it. <G> Yup, I
> do
> the exact same thing. I have tons of tags that are just for research.
> The
> output on them is UGLY, but it doesn't matter, about the only person
> that
> sees it is me. Occasionally I share with another researcher helping me
> with
> that ancestor, but it's not for public consumption. It's notes,
> guesses,
> etc. The stuff I do want printed, I use custom tags, custom roles,
> custom
> names, etc and I am very wordy in those tags because to me they are
> each
> separate paragraphs, so I don't hesitate to write out what I mean. If
> I say
> someone was ENUMERATED, that doesn't mean they went by that name, it
> means
> they were enumerated by someone else as that name. So I use the name
> as it
> was recorded, so anyone else can find them again under that
> enumeration.
> TMG allows you to say what you mean and in most cases mean what you
> say. The
> only place I'd like to be able to do this that currently we can't is
> with
> relationship tags. Would love to be able have custom sentences there as
> well.
>

This thread: