TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2010-11 > 1288803279


From: Ian Singer <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Upgrades
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 12:54:51 -0400
References: <672587378.767539.1288787173677.JavaMail.root@sz0175a.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net> <4CD15E46.2090405@iansinger.com><4CD18294.1030500@sprynet.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CD18294.1030500@sprynet.com>


On 11/3/2010 11:41 AM, Darrell A. Martin wrote:

> This can make for some really bad results if the receiving program does
> not handle nuanced sentences. For one example, I have considered using
> "negative" Roles. Let's take a hypothetical "Misidentified" Tag, Tag
> Group "Name", Role "NotNamed", male sentence "RP:NotNamed is sometimes
> incorrectly reported as a name he used< [M]>."

I would just list the name as a Name-Var and in the memo field but"this
name has been reported but there is no documentation for it"

No roles, and fine in GEDCOM <G> and it makes total sense when I read it
in TMG.

Ian Singer

--


=========================================================================
See my homepage at http://www.iansinger.com
hosted on http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=10623894
All genealogy is stored in TMG from http://www.whollygenes.com
Charts and searching using TNG from http://www.tngsitebuilding.com
I am near Toronto Canada, can I tell where you are from your reply?
=========================================================================


This thread: