TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2010-12 > 1293331946
From: Ian Singer <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Always specific names for specific events? Bad idea.
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 21:53:11 -0500
References: <50423F5353C54DCFA4D9E1CCE34A1213@jfc> <4D0E9F3C.email@example.com> <002a01cba04c$3e92ae30$bbb80a90$@net> <4D1691B7.firstname.lastname@example.org> <4D16996D.email@example.com><4D169D95.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On 12/25/2010 8:42 PM, Rick Van Dusen wrote:
> I understand that now in Old Blighty, a person who has a sex change can
> register a new birth certificate and it's a criminal offense to reveal
> the data in the old certificate. Not what genealogists want to run up
Google "sex change issue new birth certificate" and you get 250,000+
hits. Some places issue new one, others an amended one, and in the UK
you do not actually have to have had a sex change.
I know TMG does not care about your sex but can it handle multiple sexes
for the same person?
See my homepage at http://www.iansinger.com
hosted on http://www.1and1.com/?k_id=10623894
All genealogy is stored in TMG from http://www.whollygenes.com
Charts and searching using TNG from http://www.tngsitebuilding.com
I am near Toronto Canada, can I tell where you are from your reply?
|Re: [TMG] Always specific names for specific events? Bad idea. by Ian Singer <>|