TMG-L ArchivesArchiver > TMG > 2010-12 > 1293493392
From: Rick Van Dusen <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] "Conclusions"
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:43:12 -0800
References: <60E5B4B5489248CDBCA6DA7EC8BE4CF5@jfc><4D168E1F.email@example.com> <4D18ECB0.firstname.lastname@example.org>
In the words of biker "Fat Boy 'iggens", "You're makin' me 'ead 'urt."
Refining my philosophy on this issue will have to wait for another day
when I have more brain power and less demands upon it.
Darrell A. Martin wrote:
> On 12/25/2010 6:36 PM, Rick Van Dusen wrote:
>> Okay, given your definition of "conclusion", we MUST have some
>> conclusions. Meanwhile, I'm forced to loosen my definition somewhat.
> Such things may also be called
> "interpretations". The important
> distinction is between *exactly* what
> the record says, and what it *means*.