TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2010-12 > 1293493392


From: Rick Van Dusen <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] "Conclusions"
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 15:43:12 -0800
References: <60E5B4B5489248CDBCA6DA7EC8BE4CF5@jfc><4D168E1F.7080709@gmail.com> <4D18ECB0.4000702@sprynet.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D18ECB0.4000702@sprynet.com>


In the words of biker "Fat Boy 'iggens", "You're makin' me 'ead 'urt."

Refining my philosophy on this issue will have to wait for another day
when I have more brain power and less demands upon it.




Darrell A. Martin wrote:
> On 12/25/2010 6:36 PM, Rick Van Dusen wrote:
>> Okay, given your definition of "conclusion", we MUST have some
>> conclusions. Meanwhile, I'm forced to loosen my definition somewhat.
>
> Rick:
>
> Such things may also be called
> "interpretations". The important
> distinction is between *exactly* what
> the record says, and what it *means*.
>
:
:
:


This thread: