TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2011-01 > 1294597477


From: Rick Van Dusen <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] [Bulk] Re: Same-sex couple with child
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 10:24:37 -0800
References: <00BA9D890108130D022501A034@Judy-PC> <4D292EFA.3040702@whollygenes.com> <4D293807.6090109@iansinger.com> <4D294BEA.4000105@whollygenes.com><4D298E9E.8060709@iansinger.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D298E9E.8060709@iansinger.com>


Seems to me, considering the arguments here so far, including BV's
assertion that we are discussing "community/industry" standards that are
bigger than TMG's limitations, that the best way to manage this issue is
this:

If your output is "social", say so in an introductory statement.



Ian Singer wrote:
:
:
:
> So can you figure a way to let me show that in TMG reports without me
> having to switch around primary designations? That's all people are
> asking for.
>
> Ian Singer


This thread: