TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2011-03 > 1300922604


From: Rick Van Dusen <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Place Question
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:23:24 -0700
References: <011a01cbe95f$a1a71e00$e4f55a00$@net> <201132395339.916558@Terry><012501cbe98a$3e187520$ba495f60$@net>
In-Reply-To: <012501cbe98a$3e187520$ba495f60$@net>


There's actually a lot to be said for putting all the details beyond the
cemetery name in the CD. The narrative reads easily, but the info is
there for the reader who wants to look in the footnote for it.

Of course, there are different views on this.




Teresa Elliott wrote:
> Terry, Yes, one person pointed out they used [M2] and then they have that
> part print. If I had the lot I'd probably do that as well, since I wouldn't
> want a million places for the same cemetery, but since I just know down to
> section, I am leaning towards adding it to the cemetery name, like Woodmont
> Cemetery-Peace and Tranquility section.
> Another was to add the lot number to the CD field of the source and I think
> I like that idea as well, if I ever get that much detail.


This thread: