TMG-L Archives

Archiver > TMG > 2011-07 > 1311528278


From: "Teresa Elliott" <>
Subject: Re: [TMG] Baptism no Birth Query
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2011 12:24:38 -0500
References: <001301cc4a08$8cc6e2e0$a654a8a0$@net> <20117249587.395322@Terry>
In-Reply-To: <20117249587.395322@Terry>


Terry, If all the children's tags are baptismal tags, the report should not
state they were born even if those tags are in the birth group. I have to
agree with Donald on that one. This is one reason I don't group tags in
reports. Sorry but this is one area, where TMG makes assumptions instead of
using the tag sentence.

-----Original Message-----
From: [mailto:] On Behalf
Of Terry Reigel
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2011 8:58 AM
To:
Subject: Re: [TMG] Baptism no Birth Query

Teresa Elliott wrote:
> I can't test this since I don't use the baptism tag in
> the birth group, so I will have to take your word for
> this. If so, I agree this part is a bug.

Teresa,

What is the bug?

Terry Reigel
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Donald Joseph Schulteis Sent: Saturday, July 23, 2011 9:29 PM
>
> Theresa,
>
> If the tags were printed in each child's section they
> would have read - "Mary Jane" was baptized on "date"
> in the Presbyterian Church, Richmond Parish, Prince
> County, Prince EdwardIsland.
>
> David did exactly as he was supposed to do, the program
> erred.
>
> Donald


-------------------------------
When you reply to a message, please make sure that you remove all of it but
the portion to which you are replying.
-------------------------------
For searching the list archives and other list information, please go to
http://lists.rootsweb.com/index/other/Software/TMG.html.
To contact the TMG List Administrator, send a message to
.
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in
the subject and the body of the message

This thread: