TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM-L Archives

Archiver > TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM > 2010-01 > 1264350416


From: Jeanette Daniels <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] Usability [was Genealogy as a discipline]
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:26:56 -0800 (PST)
References: <33c0e.1d06f600.388d1c9f@aol.com><74483.9142.qm@web35907.mail.mud.yahoo.com><3e2fba731001240727o446713c6q9fb7bd8f1a268cb4@mail.gmail.com><618305.12871.qm@web35902.mail.mud.yahoo.com><004101ca9d10$13e6c990$3bb45cb0$@net>
In-Reply-To: <004101ca9d10$13e6c990$3bb45cb0$@net>


Many use the APG Code of Ethics.

Jeanette


----- Original Message ----
From: "" <>
To:
Sent: Sun, January 24, 2010 9:12:49 AM
Subject: Re: [TGF] Usability [was Genealogy as a discipline]

Harold wrote:
> as a potential client: given the choice between someone who strives to
adhere to a publicly defined set of standards, and one who
refers only to a personal notion of "quality research," I would choose the
first every time.


Jeanette wrote:
> Those that want to have small changes will not be straying far from the
original BCG standards but will want wording changes to their own set of
standards. 


H.G. Wells wrote:
"No passion in the world is equal to the passion to alter someone else's
draft."


:)
Elizabeth

-----------------------------------------------------------
Elizabeth Shown Mills, CG, CGL, FASG
Tennessee



-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message






This thread: