Archiver > TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM > 2010-01 > 1264438177

From: Mary Douglass <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] was GPS, now The Phrase
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:49:37 -0800 (PST)
References: <a06240829c782c19f3731@[]><406EAA3C0D6F4D4990B42E18E9ECB0AC@acer511eba12df>
In-Reply-To: <406EAA3C0D6F4D4990B42E18E9ECB0AC@acer511eba12df>

Let's agree to disagree on the following issue and move on.
I trust you're not referring to me.  I don't make provocative statements
(with intent just to "provoke" in a negative fashion). I look at things and
make suggestions, offer opinions, try to discuss points of view.  If I don't
hold to the idea of the BCG material being a foundational document of our
profession, that's not a hanging offence?

I'm not even skeptical of the BCG, I just see it as one possible attempt to
create guidelines. Not *the* set of guidelines, for me (and I suspect,
FYI: I also have a blog, but would never use it to flame someone who disagrees with me. I chose to take the higher road.

Mary Clement Douglass
Your Kansas research specialist


This thread: