TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM-L ArchivesArchiver > TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM > 2010-07 > 1279154196
From: Harold Henderson <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] EE Discussion - Fundamentals of Evidence Analysis - BasicIssues (1.3 Conclusions)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 19:36:36 -0500
Too many questions for me. I use "hypothesis" loosely to refer to any
supposition that has some evidence in its support. It's not conclusive
at all, but identifying it serves as a way of finding a place to stand
and make things a little less confusing -- even if it winds up being
disproved. I think I'm just paraphrasing the book here.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Michele Kemper <> wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
> Doing a complete search is just the beginning of evidence analysis. Once you
> have the information, what do you do with it? That is what the next set of
> sections begins to address. The next subsection begins to talk about extracting
> and assessing data from the sources we get information from. We start with
> drawing conclusions and proving them.
> Here are a list of the subsections within the Basic Issues:
> 1.1 Analysis & Mindset
> 1.2 Completeness of research
> 1.3 Conclusions: hypothesis, theory & proof
> 1.4 Facts vs. assertion or claim
> 1.5 Family-history standards
> 1.6 Levels of confidence
> 1.7 Objectivity
> 1.8 Presentism
> 1.9 Quantity vs. quality
> 1.10 Technical knowledge
> 1.11 Truth
> Discussion: 1.3 Conclusions: hypothesis, theory & proof
> The books explains there are generally three levels of conclusions that we as
> researchers can come to: hypothesis, theory, proof. For each one of these
> levels, can you provide details on how you define each? What would move your
> conclusions up or down on that spectrum (from hypothesis to theory, from theory
> to proof, etc.)? Do you have any additions to this list of possible conclusions?
> Have you ever been presented with a situation where you could not reach a
> conclusion? Without revealing confidential client details, can you explain that
> situation and what you did in the wake of the evidence?
> The Transitional Genealogists List was created to provide a safe environment for genealogists to learn best practices as they transition to professional level work. Please respect the kind intentions of this list.
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
Research and Writing from NW Indiana
|Re: [TGF] EE Discussion - Fundamentals of Evidence Analysis - BasicIssues (1.3 Conclusions) by Harold Henderson <>|