TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM-L Archives

From: <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2011 19:27:20 -0500
References: <COL107-W3329B4CE8DA150DB52425392380@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <COL107-W3329B4CE8DA150DB52425392380@phx.gbl>

Melanie wrote:
>I just had to share some incomprehensible reasoning (to me at least) I had
from a client recently. We are unable to move any further back on his
grandmother's line because she was an abandoned child and we've exhausted
all resources. However, I could extend his grandfather's line past 1809
with research in the parish records.

>He doesn't want to do it because then his family tree would be lopsided,
having so much more on his grandfather than his grandmother. Ummm...just
what do I say to that?


I'm sure you'll resist the temptation to suggest that he might be related to
Monk. :)

Elizabeth

This thread:

• [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by "Melanie D. Holtz CG" <>
  • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by Harold Henderson <>

  • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by <>

  • [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by "Melanie D. Holtz CG" <>
    • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by "Elizabeth Swanay-O'Neal" <>
  • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by
  • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by
  • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by
    • Re: [TGF] Incomprehensible Reasoning by Kim Ostermyer <>