TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM-L Archives

From: <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] A question of style
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 12:56:32 -0500
References: <8B757E763F8C41ED86EF27947F8134A6@MicheleToshiba><CABPpKTgbjArfMAcCi0-tDeJJNVLMh5cNYtcGRMLPxfZ3bkxqqw@mail.gmail.com><006a01ccd14d$76dc0740$649415c0$@comcast.net>
In-Reply-To: <006a01ccd14d$76dc0740$649415c0$@comcast.net>

Harold wrote:
>My own non-authoritative experience is that ... this kind of deviation [is]
not going to fail you. Not consulting a commonly used source, analyzing it
wrong, or claiming to have proved something you didn't would be much more
serious and would start moving you down from "meets standards" to "partially
meets standards" or worse.

You are right, I am sweating the small stuff. I am just worried about
making sure everything is just so because of the high failure rate. Funny
thing is, I am not that worried about the actual content :) :)

Thanks,
Michele

This thread:

• [TGF] A question of style by <>
  • Re: [TGF] A question of style by Harold Henderson <>
    • Re: [TGF] A question of style by <>

      • Re: [TGF] A question of style by <>

        • Re: [TGF] A question of style by <>
  • Re: [TGF] A question of style by <>