UK-CENSUS-HELPERS-L Archives

Archiver > UK-CENSUS-HELPERS > 2009-01 > 1232158258


From: Mark Hattam <>
Subject: Re: [UK-CENSUS-HELPERS] LOOK-UP PLEASE
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:10:58 +0000
References: <000801c97841$75e0e490$76e136d2@Abyssinian><F62F61A6951D41C0A4DB017EE12D86A8@yourffab282a4d><0EB4FC86-ECB5-489C-AE26-86AC83CAD5D9@dxradio.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <0EB4FC86-ECB5-489C-AE26-86AC83CAD5D9@dxradio.demon.co.uk>


And I should also refer to the 1871, where in Colton there's
John Barraclogh Fell (55) a Civel Engineer, Marianne Fell (48), wife,
and John Henry (9).

But there's no way that I can "make" that 1861 entry read "Marianne"
however hard I try.

Mark

--

On 17 Jan 2009, at 02:02, Mark Hattam wrote:

> Looking at the 1851, John B Fell, Marianne Fell, Emily J, George N,
> Frederick ? ... right ages, same occup, same place.
>
> And there's a "Suitable" marriage in 1844 in FreeBMD.
>
> However, that doesn't get around the 1861 which looks like Hancuss,
> Hanaiss ... very similar to the Han of Hannah a few lines above, and
> the H like the H in Head, and not like the M in Mar, Mary or Michael
> etc.
>
> Good luck
>
> Mark
>
> --
>
>
> On 17 Jan 2009, at 01:37, Terry Waters-Marsh wrote:
>
>> Dear Stan,
>>
>> That's a shocker. My guess would be Hanaiss or Hanaess.
>>
>> Warmest regards,
>>
>> Terry Waters-Marsh
>> FreeCEN Country Coordinator for ENGLAND
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From:
>> [mailto:] On Behalf Of stan
>> bayne
>> Sent: Saturday, 17 January 2009 11:17 AM
>> To:
>> Subject: [UK-CENSUS-HELPERS] LOOK-UP PLEASE
>>
>> RG 09 3166
>>
>> File 01359
>> ED 6a
>> Fol 58
>> Pg 5
>> Sch 21
>>
>> Can someone please decipher the wife's name?
>>
>> Stan
>> NZ

This thread: