USGENWEB-ALL-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-ALL > 2007-01 > 1168049524


From: "Scott Burow" <>
Subject: Re: [ABChat] Bylaw Proposal Revision 6
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 20:12:04 -0600
References: <001f01c730fb$d8bf78e0$cef71640@wchs>


I agree with you Phyllis. As I recall the concern was that there were
'other' procedures that might not be called "grievance procedures" which
handle the same type of issue. The thought was to cover the possibility
with 'local grievance process or other process at the state or special
project level'.

I think leaving the 'or' out makes more sense.

Scott


----- Original Message -----
From: "Phyllis Rippee" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: [ABChat] Bylaw Proposal Revision 6


> I'm confused by the word "or"....I believe that it should be left out, so
> that
>
> Article XIV, Section 6. (2 Jan)
> All actions, whether by the national Grievance Committee or by a local
> grievance or process at the state or special project level, shall be
> characterized by fairness, courtesy, and respect for the dignity and the
> rights of each individual. <etc>
>
> Becomes: All actions, whether by the national Grievance Committee or by a
> local grievance process at the state or special project level....etc.
>
> Could even leave out the "local" and maintain the intended meaning.
>
> Phyllis
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
> quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This thread: