USGENWEB-ALL-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-ALL > 2008-10 > 1224975091


From: "Mike St. Clair/ST" <>
Subject: Re: [ABChat] Official Report of the Webmaster Study Group
Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 16:51:31 -0600
References: <00a901c93648$c37093d0$6a01a8c0@Sherri><4902C887.2030009@saintclair.org> <4902D522.4070409@saintclair.org><54E67640DD844C668649056C9B5C2635@CyndieDell>
In-Reply-To: <54E67640DD844C668649056C9B5C2635@CyndieDell>


The heading for section 4 reads:

Section 4: Responsibility of the NC or Designated Individual with
Control Panel Access:

Doesn't that cover your concern?

Mike St. Clair

Cyndie wrote:
> These procedures are for the long term and need to be flexible enough to
> meet our future needs. Because we discussed the possibility of future AB's
> opting for the webmaster to have access to the Control Panel, I'm not in
> favor of changing this title to Content Manager. In the future, we may have
> the national website on its own hosting plan paid through a PayPal account
> which could likely create a situation where granting CP access to the
> webmaster is not the concern that it is now. I don't know if my suggestion
> to change the heading for section 4 from responsibilities of the NC to
> responsibility for the designated person with Control Panel Access is going
> to be included in the final version, but that would allow for whoever has
> access to the CP to manage those items and would not require us to make
> changes in the procedures if that person is the webmaster in the future.
>
> As far as defining the webmaster and assistant webmaster responsibilities in
> more detail, my thought was to leave the flexibility in that up to the
> preferences of the two individuals. I'm open to it if others agree that it
> is needed.
>
> Thanks,
> Cyndie
> SP Rep.

This thread: