USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 1999-02 > 0918896353


From: "Ms. Piglet" <>
Subject: Re: [USGENWEB-SW-L] Board Action
Date: Sat, 13 Feb 1999 02:59:13 -0600


We're starting to work on stuff....it's my impression that things got put on
hold for the elections, and it's only been about ten days that the board has
been together....some of that's been spent on newbies finding out how it all
works. Kind of hard to just hop right back in when so many folks, including
the NC, are new.

piglet (megan zurawicz) ICQ: 18429839
note: was , now
genealogy-- http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~piglet
quilting-- http://pages.prodigy.net/mspiglet
theatre-- http://members.aol.com/tupacratz/poohpix.htm

-----Original Message-----
From: Don Tharp <>
To: <>
Date: Friday, 12 February, 1999 21:48
Subject: [USGENWEB-SW-L] Board Action

>Everything is very quite, is the board in session? By my count there is
>plenty to be done, some from the session prior to elections. Listed below
>are some of the items that are still open from prior sessions.
>
>The grievance concerning Kenny Thomas has never been resolved. Action was
>voted to be accomplished, but action was never implemented. Kansas is still
>without its own selected archive file manager.
>
>A motion was approved to form a grievance committee. Is there such a
>committee? One board member recently stated that the board had no authority
>to review grievances. What is the status?
>
>Nancy Trice is still listed as the administrator of the .org and .net
>domains. Shouldn't that be changed to Tim Stowell?
>
>The position of secretary was tabled, this motion should be opened,
>discussed and closed one way or the other to clear the motion. Perhaps we
>need a secretary to keep track of all the open motions and to get the
motion
>information to the web masters.
>
>The By Laws review committee was tabled to be further discussed among the
>board in a medium that would allow for sufficient reflection. The medium
>wasn't spelled out, but has any discussion been held? Will there be?
>
>Also tabled was discussion of whether or not a RootsWeb representative
>should be part of The USGenWeb Advisory Board. Should this be allowed to
>drag on?
>
>Is there any action to be taken in the future concerning incorporation of
>USGW as a non profit organization? Seems the discussion of the .com domain
>is hanging until that is settled. When are we to become a bona fide
>organization?
>
>The web pages for the Motions/Votes has not been updated since December 23,
>1998. Haven't there been motions and votes since then?
>
>Don
>
>Chautauqua County, KS CC
>
>
>

This thread: