USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2005-03 > 1111854674


From: "Peggy B. Perazzo" <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] another state might have same problem - question
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:31:14 -0800
References: <42451CA8.4000605@sampubco.com>
In-Reply-To: <42451CA8.4000605@sampubco.com>


Does this pertain to present-day obituaries that are posted with the
permission of the newspaper?

Peggy B. Perazzo

Yolo County CA USGenWeb Project Coordinator
http://www.cagenweb.com/yolo/
All outgoing mail virus free, scanned by Norton Antivirus
http://www.symantec.com/


At 12:26 AM 3/26/2005, you wrote:
>It's Indiana.
>
>they have marriage records to 1951
>
>The motion if extended to all, will affect Indiana because of the arbitary
>cut off of 1930.
>
>New York has marriage applications to 1938 and they're loaded!
>
>I sent a suggestion of replacement motion to at least 5 of the AB who have
>already on record being uncomfortable with the motion. The replacement
>motion is below.
>
>
>Substitution Motion
>
>The Specific Information Removal Policy
>
>The specific information shall be removed upon receipt of the complaint of
>the living person direct affected within 7 days by the coordinator or file
>manager in charge of specific information in question.
>
>The policy shall be applied to all parts of The USGenWeb Project.
>
>Anyone care to think it should be improved?
>
>David Samuelsen
>
>
>
>==== USGENWEB-SW Mailing List ====
>To unsubscribe, send a message to
>with the one word, unsubscribe. If you are subbed to the digest,
>send it to
>

This thread: