USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

From: Bosque Lover <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Motion 05-12
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:31:21 -0500
References: <003201c596aa$098bf0e0$0d73a00c@wchs>

> My question to you
> was "Has the NC always been held to having to ask if there is any further
> discussion?"

I don't believe so, but I've never seen one keep going when discussion by the AB
members is wanted, & just ignore the statements of "protest". Sturgis clarified
that this cannot be done. We're either going to use Sturgis or we're not. We
can't just do it when it suits us

> As far as trying to table a motion while it is being voted on....totally
> ridiculous!

Not if discussion is still going on, which it should've have been, so "legally"
& according to pp, it was appropriate.

I agree with Mike that we need some procedures set. I am sure those could be
ignored just as pp has.

Having gotten a very late start, I'm off for a bit of fun right now.
Have a good week everyone
Bettie <><
--
Free to good home: one useless copy of The Standard Code of Parliamentary
Procedure, by Alice Sturgis

This thread:

• Motion 05-12 by "Phyllis Rippee" <>

  • Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Motion 05-12 by Bosque Lover <>