USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2005-08 > 1123117094


From: merope <>
Subject: Question for Roger
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2005 20:59:32 -0400
References: <20050803184825.58B08DF58@maila.timptech.com> <004301c59865$be0366e0$0100a8c0@DAD>
In-Reply-To: <004301c59865$be0366e0$0100a8c0@DAD>


Thanks Roger!

Now I have a question for you. Shari (I think) has suggested that Kathi
and Cyndie be allowed to serve until the person for the new seat can be
elected. Is this legal, given that the seats they occupied have been
eliminated?

Also, would it be legal under the bylaws and/or Sturgis for the Board to
appoint one of them to be the new Special Projects rep until the special
election can be held? I'm not finding anything in the bylaws or Sturgis
that would prevent this, but I could be missing something. It would be
a difficult choice between them, but it would satisfy the issue of the
Special Projects being without representation until the special election
can be held.

-Teresa

Roger Swafford wrote:
> Sturgis pg205.
> Bylaws are effective immediately upon adoption unless the motion which
> placed the issue to a vote included details regarding some part/portion not
> taking effect immediately.
> In this case I don't think any provision was made to to delay the immediate
> effect of the adopted amendment.
>
> Roger
> Member-Parliamentarian

This thread: