USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2005-08 > 1123176302


From: "Roger Swafford" <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Question for Roger
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 12:25:02 -0500
References: <20050803184825.58B08DF58@maila.timptech.com> <004301c59865$be0366e0$0100a8c0@DAD> <42F16874.6010806@radix.net>


No, when the amendment adoption was announced the current positions ceased
to exist. The time such considerations has long past.

Yes, because of the delay in conducting a special election the AB could
appoint a interim rep. To do so provides for special projects representation
and assists the AB in performing its duties.
Roger


> From: "merope" <>
> Thanks Roger!
>
> Now I have a question for you. Shari (I think) has suggested that Kathi
> and Cyndie be allowed to serve until the person for the new seat can be
> elected. Is this legal, given that the seats they occupied have been
> eliminated?
>
> Also, would it be legal under the bylaws and/or Sturgis for the Board to
> appoint one of them to be the new Special Projects rep until the special
> election can be held? I'm not finding anything in the bylaws or Sturgis
> that would prevent this, but I could be missing something. It would be
> a difficult choice between them, but it would satisfy the issue of the
> Special Projects being without representation until the special election
> can be held.
>
> -Teresa
>

This thread: