USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2005-12 > 1134753879


From: "Don Kelly" <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Another committee
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 09:24:39 -0800
References: <Version.32.20051216103459.00e49230@pop.central.cox.net>


How about DonT's only shorter:
----- Original Message -----
From: "Don Tharp" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, December 16, 2005 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Another committee


>I can see no purpose served by a committee that would produce anything more
> meaningful than that which has already been suggested by a board member,
> that is;
>
> "When the EC suspects it has a case of a person using multiple identities
> for the purposes of voting, it should immediately notify the AB and the SC
> of the states where the alleged fraud is taking place. The EC should also
> provide the AB and the SC all the evidence it has at its disposal. The EC
> will then wait on further orders from the AB."
>
> I would add only one word to the above; after the word voting insert
> fraud,
> which would make it read
>
> When the EC suspects a person using multiple identities
> for the purposes of voting fraud, it shall immediately notify the AB and
> the SC of the state where the alleged fraud is taking place.

The EC shall also provide the AB and the SC the evidence of attempted fraud.

The EC will then wait for further input from the AB. DonK


>
> At 04:36 PM 12/15/2005 -0600, you wrote:
>>Hi folks
>>The AB is doing a straw poll on this question:
>>Do you agree or disagree with setting up a committee to develop
>>procedures for handling possible alias situations?
>>
>>What are your thoughts on this kind of committee?
>>Bettie <><
>>
>>
>>
>>==== USGENWEB-SW Mailing List ====
>>To search the mail list archives, go to
>>http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=USGENWEB-SW
>>
>
>
>
>
> ==== USGENWEB-SW Mailing List ====
> The Advisory Board: http://www.usgenweb.com/about/advisoryboard.shtml
>

This thread: