USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2006-03 > 1142863953


From: "teri" <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] AB Motion 06-03
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 08:13:26 -0600
References: <441DEA1F.B79E8536@earthlink.net>


It seems pretty clear cut to me.

If maintaining an official county site is a requirement to be an member of
the USGenWeb, then despite whatever grievances, linking/delinking, whether
it was fair/not fair, etc --- while this person may be qualified to be on
the AB --- they are clearly not eligible to run for the position.

If he wants to challenge the ruling, that's fine. It doesn't change
anything. He's still not eligible.

Teri
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bosque Lover" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 5:32 PM
Subject: [USGenWeb-SW] AB Motion 06-03


> The following motion was made
> I move that Daryl Lytton be dropped from the list of qualified persons
> available for the Representative at Large office appointment process
> -------------------
> Some background on this:
> Daryl was removed as a CC (County Coordinator) by the SC (State
> Coordinator). He filed a grievance with the AB, & the AB ruled in his
> favor, saying his county site should be re-linked. The SC refused.
> Daryl was nominated or volunteered for the RAL position, but Daryl has
> no other qualifying positions within the project & has now challenged
> the ruling that he is not qualified.
>
> Discussion/comments on this motion?
> Bettie <><
>
>
>
> ==== USGENWEB-SW Mailing List ====
> To search the mail list archives, go to
> http://listsearches.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/listsearch.pl?list=USGENWEB-SW

This thread: