USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2006-06 > 1150716856


From: Billie Erin Walsh <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Final report & recommendation of Grievance ProceduresCommittee
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:34:16 -0500
References: <448F27A6.9050502@tatumtel.net> <44928CE2.6050506@radix.net> <44960FAA.2000103@tatumtel.net> <001301c6934c$4a3a4c50$6c3e7941@Mitchell>
In-Reply-To: <001301c6934c$4a3a4c50$6c3e7941@Mitchell>


On 06/18/2006 Karen Mitchell wrote:
> Good evening Bettie,
> I have a slight problem with this part:
>
> "The review at this level should assume that the facts stated in the
> complaint are true, and the determination of the viability of the
> grievance
> made based upon the assumption that the complaint is true and a
> review of
> the by-laws, policies, or procedures alleged to have been violated."
> Guilty until proven innocent?
>
> Karen Mitchell
>

With a quick scan I couldn't find this passage, but if I remember from
my first reading this is more or less a review of the Grevience
Committee. To make sure they followed the correct steps and
interpretation of the bylaws.

Quite often when a case is sent on to a higher court of law there is
simply a review of the original trial to make sure due process was
followed. No testimony is involved. This is much the same thing.

I wish you had given the section.


--

(o:]>*HUGGLES*<[:o)
Billie Walsh
The three best words in the English Language:
"I LOVE YOU"
Pass then on!

This thread: