USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2006-06 > 1151147855


From: merope <>
Subject: Guilty before innocent
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 07:17:35 -0400
References: <449C3928.4080300@tatumtel.net> <002101c69709$5d890b00$6501a8c0@D6YZBQ51> <010001c69724$6e175ec0$4a60bd43@don> <000b01c69726$39ec0b80$6401a8c0@SMP6DGEd850> <016601c6972b$a1301a70$4a60bd43@don> <000901c6972d$cf165e70$6401a8c0@SMP6DGEd850> <001601c6973e$c4abd580$4a60bd43@don>
In-Reply-To: <001601c6973e$c4abd580$4a60bd43@don>


Donal O'Kelly wrote:

>
> So now the democratic process steps in. Each member of the AB will
> have their own personal perspective........perhaps supported by what
> they for a fact know, and/or other
> perspectives based on second level information.......the posibilities
> are endless.
>
> These various perspectives will ebb and flow around the segments of
> evidence as each is discovered; input from the membership will be
> solicited, the scales will be used, then they will come together and
> vote.
>

This is really how you want criminal matters in USGenWeb to be handled?

-Teresa

This thread: