USGENWEB-SW-L Archives

Archiver > USGENWEB-SW > 2006-08 > 1155523946


From: merope <>
Subject: Re: [USGenWeb-SW] Motion 06-15
Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 22:52:26 -0400
References: <20060812231740.ISIF10599.eastrmmtao02.cox.net@eastrmimpo01.cox.net> <Version.32.20060813163827.00f5cc48@pop.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <Version.32.20060813163827.00f5cc48@pop.central.cox.net>


Actually, you wouldn't want to use the term "special projects
coordinator" either. That also has a specific meaning and it severely
limits who among the volunteers in each special project is eligible to
serve.

-Teresa

Don Tharp wrote:
> Hello Scott, regarding 5a & 5b, yes I thought is was just something
> overlooked in the process.
>
> While the AB is attending to that why not change the wording concerning the
> representative. I know and you know what was meant, but five years from now
> someone may challenge the fact that representative was stated in upper
> case, taking away the simple meaning of one that serves as an example.
>
> The upper case raises it into the area found in ARTICLE XIII. SPECIAL
> PROJECTS and ARTICLE VI: DUTIES/QUALIFICATIONS OF ADVISORY BOARD where, in
> both articles, the term Special Projects Representative is used to define
> an elected official of the AB.
>
> If for some reason the AB doesn't like the term Special Projects
> coordinator then it could be restated more clearly, albeit more wordy as:
>
> The panel must include a State Coordinator representative , a Special
> Projects representative, and three County Coordinators/Local Coordinators
> representatives.
>
>
> At 04:28 PM 8/13/2006 -0500, you wrote:
>
>> Hi Don
>>
>>> 1.) Committee Membership
>>> The Grievance Committee shall consist of seven
>>> members of The
>>> USGenWeb Project in good standing. The panel must include a
>>> State
>>> Coordinator, a Special Projects Representative, and three County
>>>
>>> Coordinators/Local Coordinators
>>>
>>> Question: Does this actually mean a Special Projects Representative or
>>> does
>>> it mean a Special Projects Coordinator? We use the term Representative as
>>> an elected official of the AB.
>>>
>>>
>> No, it simply means a representative from the Special Projects, not the AB
>> Special Projects Rep.
>>
>>
>>> 2.) The existing standing procedure has time limits for filing a
>>> grievance,
>>> i.e.,
>>> a. Any member of the USGenWeb Project, filing on his/her own behalf,
>>> within
>>> 45 days of incident, or discovery of incident.
>>> b. Former USGenWeb members
>>> within 14 days of termination of membership either with the Project, or
>>> within a specific State or Special Project.
>>> c. Transcribers and accepted
>>> contributing researchers, within 45 days of incident, or discovery of
>>> incident.
>>>
>>> Question: If there any time limits in the new procedure I have overlooked
>>> them.
>>>
>>>
>> This is an error that needs to be corrected. In the division of the
>> Sections when they were posted to the AB list, Sections 5(a) and (b) were
>> left out accidentally. I believe this was simply a clerical error that was
>> not caught, and will be corrected shortly.
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>> ==== USGENWEB-SW Mailing List ====
>> The Advisory Board: http://www.usgenweb.com/about/advisoryboard.shtml
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
> ==== USGENWEB-SW Mailing List ====
> To unsubscribe, send a message to
> with the one word, unsubscribe. If you are subbed to the digest,
> send it to
>
>
>

This thread: