VATICAN-CITY-L Archives

From:
Subject: George Bush / Horrific New World Order
Date: 26 May 2004 10:10:55 -0600

This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list.

Classification: Lookup

Message Board URL:

http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/QkC.2ACI/92

Message Board Post:

George W. Bush and his Administration have been devising a “pact” to govern and manage a “New World Order” one country at a time. The Master Plan begins with undermining and infiltrating the least developed countries, and then moving towards governorship of the more developed countries. “One of the success stories at the Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development was a Global Compact partnership effort to promote private sector investment in the least developed countries”. “Global Compact consists entirely of a set of Nested Networks” that are currently aligning themselves to establish this “New World Order”
The main “partner” are Corporations and the plan is to establish structured communities and working environments that will “mold and refine” the new “Corporate Citizen”. The website has several articles pertaining to the “Corporate Citizen”, “Training”, and the role of the Corporation.
One article titled “Raising the Bar-Creating value with the UnGlobal Compact” says:
“When they embrace Corporate Citizenship in ways that draw on the same human qualities and practices described as “business excellence”, companies actually enhance their competitiveness and financial value creation”. “For many companies, the journey is just starting - How can they ensure that they align with the Global Compact in ways that continue to reward their business objectives”?
The “plan”, even though seemingly still in a grass roots format, has aligned several “civil society” organizations from over 70 Countries with a “Network” of over 1000 Corporations.
“Raising the Bar” suggests practical guidance with an inventory of knowledge, tools, examples and information sources, all organized around basic “performance model” that embraces concepts familiar to most business people”. No preamble that includes the people of a given country or region with regards to their existing culture and heritage. The only discussion is in terms of “how do we get around the humanitarian issue” and still remain in the realm of International Labor Law. There is, however, disturbing dialog that discusses a sort of “melding of shared social values”. “Embedding the global market within shared social values and institutional practices represents a task of historic magnitude”. “The reason is obvious: there is no government at the global level to act on behalf of the common good as there is at the natural level, and international institutions are far too we!
ak to fully compensate”. The lines are blurred in regards to shared social values and what is meant by a social value. “National markets are held together by shared values. In the face of economic transition and insecurity, people know that if the worst comes to the worst they can rely on the expectation that certain minimum standards will prevail”. A highly structured Corporate environment that disregards culture and a heritage that spans centuries.

Kofi Annon believes that “Business has a critical role to play because it has so much at stake - not only large multinational enterprises but also smaller national and local firms; many of which depend upon, directly or indirectly, a stable and sustainable global economy”. Moreover, business has a capacity that other social actors lack: it has global reach, through transnational firms and supply chains; it directly affects communities in which it operates and it can move at a speed that few governments or international agencies rarely are able to match”.


What if the people of a country did not want to take part in this “Master Plan” and move at the “speed of light” all in the namesake of Business? What right do we have to dictate to other people how to behave and live.
This notion of a Global Economy is one thing, but to totally disregard individual societies, no matter how small or seemingly inconsequential, is a violation to humanity to the highest degree.

The rhetoric continues throughout the article and a Universal Declaration is being devised. The Universal Declaration embraces 3 critical areas of human rights.
Rights protecting life and security of the person: among others , these include the right to: life, liberty and security; freedom from slavery, servitude, torture and cruel inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment equal protection of the law; freedom from arbitrary arrest, and judicial remedy against human rights violations before a court, economic, social and cultural rights. These include the right to: a standard of living adequate for health and well-being that includes food, clothing, housing, medical care and access to social services and social security, just a favorable remuneration ensuring workers and workers families an existence worthy of human dignity; form and join trade unions; rest and leisure. “These rights are intended to be realized through national efforts and international co-operation in accordance with conditions in each state.
I guess the right to pursue happiness has now been replaced with the right to security , per this Universal Declaration and Master Plan outlined in the UnGlobal Compact.

Then there is the “Global Compact Principle - Global International Human Rights”
This includes the “Right to Work, To just and favorable conditions of work, social security, social insurance - adequate standard of living , the right to health, and the right to education .
Not only would you be allowed social insurance, but you would also have the right to your own health.

Then the whole mess of security issues and the new so-called inalienable right of “security”. “While all Companies have the need to attend to Security Forces - differ in industries and Companies”.
Since, the lines are also blurred in regards to International Law regarding force to make people comply with this new Global Economy Pact, Corporations can now take the “law into there own hands” to accomplish their goals. “Companies should assess their spheres of influence and design their human rights responsibilities accordingly. Business should support and respect the protection of internationally proclaimed human rights within their sphere of influence.”
“There is now a growing consensus that human rights are also applicable to private bodies if they are in a position to significantly influence the lives of individuals and society. Human rights are being recognized as a tool to shape community life in a wider sense, horizontally protecting not only individual human beings but also core values of the community”.
Corporations will now need to enact new bylaws into there Mission Statement and Code of Ethics with regards to “Human Rights”, but some will also be enacting “Military Law” clauses to protect individuals security, but maybe more importantly, themselves.
All of this information, and a whole lot more, can be located at UnGlobal Compact website at
www.unglobalcompact.org Once at the UnGlobal Compact home page do a “search”with the word “torture” and these articles and others will appear. Most of this information is located article PDF file titled Part 1, but other PDF files listed on the page include wip_part1[2]
There is a file listed as wip_part1 ,without the brackets and the number 2, but if you can locate the file which includes the [2] then you have some radical information. All the files are radical, and worth investigating, and I hope you do, but the [2] is extra radical.
Last year when we supposedly “won the war”, there was a UN Meeting that was held April 23-25, 2003 at the United Nations Headquarters in New York. The results of the meeting created a “Report On The Meeting of The Expert Group On The World Economic Situation and Prospects” called “Project LINK” prepared by the Economic Monitoring and Assessment Unit
(EMAU) of the Department for Economic and Social Affairs(DESA) hosted the meeting and over 70 participants from 50 countries, as well as, several representing from International agencies and the United Nations Secretariat attended.
Mr. Hans Timmer a presenter at the meeting on behalf of the World Bank discussed the importance of worker’s remittances and the capital flow in developing Countries. “He claimed that capital flows across Countries, unlike trade flows, were not determined by comparative advantage (that is, in the view of the note-taker, by comparative labor / capital ratios across countries)”. I guess a note-takers viewpoint constitutes “Capital Flow” across Country boundaries.
Mr. Timmer pointed out that “workers remittances to developing Countries had increased over the past few years and now the total now exceeded the amount of Official Development Assistance (ODA) to this group”. The “Two main sources of remittances have been the US and Saudia Arabia”. However, there has been an “abrupt decline” in remittances, due in part, to the Iraqi War. Again the flow of capital has been redirected to the Iraq War and Security Issues, not to mention the manipulation of workers hard earned money.
This report is located at www.un.org/esa/analysis/link/link2003spring.pdf
Then there are the issues pertaining to “Training” and the New World Order for “developing Countries”. Some “Training Manuals” are located on the European Union website and pertain to workers in Europe in a continuum of the Bush Administration’s Master Plan for Global Down Turn.
These workplace training manuals being promoted by the Eu can be found at
www.eurofound.ie/working/health/promotion/index.htm The web page would not allow me to access the information enclosed in the manuals, but the statements on the EU web page are
alarming. “There is a increased focus on preventative activities and a relative reduction in the prevalence of traditional health and safety hazards. Other workplace and labor market changes pose different problems, such as the pressures that absenteeism may put on the general health of all employees”. Then the statement “How can employers be motivated to improve standards of health and safety without the need for ever more stringent legislation? One answer may lie in economic incentives”. Basically a “pay off” to overlook the sacrifices made to a workers health and safety, as well as, the emergence of “A Foundation project to collect and analyze information in this area drew on an international study of
economic incentive schemes”.
The workplace “Training Manuals” listed at the bottom of the web page are titled:



1) “New approaches to improve the health of a changing workforce”

2) “Manual for training in workplace health promotion”

3) “Workplace health promotion in Europe”

Imagine if we would have allowed the inspectors to remain in Iraq and not declared War, plus forgot about any type of “remittances” or funneling of capital to under developed Countries, and directed the now approaching 1 Trillion Dollar / Iraq War Price Tag, and a additional proposed Trillion Dollar Ballistic Missile Shield (which has a fifteen year projection) to AIDS/HIV and World Hunger. And we were not involved in any of the numerous unethical and destructive business practices and policies taking place, do you think the Worlds Trust Level of the United States would be any different and do you think peace and harmony could be anymore easily obtained?
Please help to put an immediate stop to the Bush Monster Machine and approach Global Policy in a more realistic and healthy manner. Thanks.

This thread:

• George Bush / Horrific New World Order by