VERMONT-L Archives
Archiver > VERMONT > 2006-03 > 1141619347
From: W David Samuelsen <>
Subject: Re: [VERMONT] Castle/Hurd
Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 21:29:07 -0700
References: <BAY106-DAV158CB2BCB72C814CBEA80090E80@phx.gbl> <440AAAD0.9090902@sampubco.com> <002d01c64066$b1985470$aa976247@DHTGXX81> <440B2697.5000701@sampubco.com> <038f01c64082$71fbeea0$6601a8c0@1070n> <440B894B.7000802@sampubco.com> <000c01c640c2$895f6000$0300a8c0@vermontel.net> <BAY106-DAV2254AE1B67802F34411BB090E90@phx.gbl> <04b401c640cd$5a097380$6601a8c0@1070n>
In-Reply-To: <04b401c640cd$5a097380$6601a8c0@1070n>
MScheffler wrote:
> Hi Joyce,
>
> Have you tried alternate spellings of CASTLE. One of the Barbour
> entries had it as CASSELL and the Vermont Families in 1791 indicates
> CASWELL was sometimes spelled CASTLE. I didn't see any Roswells under
> any possible spellings. The Barbour Salisbury volume uses the spelling
> CASTEL.
>
> Margaret Scheffler
The IGI has all together: Castle, Castell, Castel, Cassell, under major
surname being Castle.
W. David Samuelsen
This thread:
| Re: [VERMONT] Castle/Hurd by W David Samuelsen <> |