Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-L Archives

Archiver > Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I > 2007-12 > 1197922876


From: Linda Threadgill <>
Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] 53/54 markers match
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 13:21:16 -0700
References: <4765C999.9070400@powerc.net><00b801c84058$3617faa0$6400a8c0@Ken1> <4766B8FD.60909@powerc.net><000b01c840d8$be50f770$6400a8c0@Ken1><4766C433.5010005@powerc.net> <073301c840e4$bd5032d0$1a0219ac@Technodwmlaptop><005501c840e6$bc1e3090$6400a8c0@Ken1>
In-Reply-To: <005501c840e6$bc1e3090$6400a8c0@Ken1>


Ken,
This is what I see at all 3 projects: I hope this formats correctly.
This is from the Black Potomac Valley Project.

267 William McKenzie ca 1852 TN *I1c* 14 23 16 10 15 16 11
14 12 13 12 29 16 8 10 11 11 26 14 20 29 11 15
15 15 11 10 19 21 14 14 18 18 33 36 12 9 11
8 15 16 8 12 10 8 10 9
0****
<http://www.familytreedna.com/ftGroups_score_frame_classic.aspx?pass=ZpYU8l8oy8kluzvOrshRe%2bfM6Ma2nXS01tkG0Iak5PURMftastABJRltynkXrpki13Eq6IXMBs6Odx7hi8nczK8MLXfGMapt6GnLm0dwILLnGzqTlAP%2bjEq5ZFgJKqkefwdP2bTjZRA%3d#nulldesc>;
13 12 13 10 11 12 11



With the following explanation:

"****A value "0" for any marker indicates that the lab reported a null
value or no result for this marker. All cases of this nature are
retested multiple times by the lab to confirm their accuracy. Mutations
causing null values are infrequent, but are passed on to offspring just
like other mutations, so related male lineages such as a father and son
would likely share any null values."

I am wondering why it was not left blank since I know according to FTDNA
that it wasn't tested. Dave says he had noticed the same thing with his
McMillan project. I also just found out the FTDNA is closed today
because they are moving so I can't call them.

Linda


This thread: