GEN-MEDIEVAL-L Archives
Archiver > GEN-MEDIEVAL > 2006-11 > 1164608428
From: "Merilyn Pedrick" <>
Subject: Re: Ducal kinsfolk: Arthur, Duke of Brittany's kinsman, Robert de Vitré
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:50:28 +1030 (Cen. Australia Standard Time)
References: <c1d.a953e53.329bd8b7@aol.com>
Dear Will
Yes, I appear to have slipped in an extra John. Sorry for the mistake. My
database says the same as yours.
Merilyn
-------Original Message-------
From:
Date: 11/27/06 16:32:00
To:
Subject: Re: Ducal kinsfolk: Arthur, Duke of Brittany's kinsman, Robert de
Vitré
In a message dated 11/25/06 3:11:52 PM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:
<< 6. Roger de Mowbray
7. John de Mowbray
8. John de Mowbray
9. John de Mowbray
10. John de Mowbray, Duke of Norfolk
11. Eleanor Mowbray >>
In this section you have one extra John compared to me.
Here is what I have with dates
Eleanor Mowbray "eldest daughter" b abt 25 Mar 1364
John, 4th Lord /Mowbray/ of Axholme, co Lincs. b 25 Jun 1340
John, 3rd Lord /Mowbray/ of Thirsk b 29 Nov 1310
John, 2nd Lord /Mowbray/ "said to have been born 4 Sep 1286" (see also AR8,
Line 18A, pg 29)
Roger, Lord /Mowbray/ 1295 "Minor in 1266"
Will Johnson
-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
with the word 'unsubscribe' without the
quotes in the subject and the body of the message
This thread: