GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: "Fran Akridge" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:36:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1d7.3442b87e.2f18a27e@aol.com>

While John's statistical statements are correct (unless I have missed
something, they are always correct) and Ann's example is outstanding in
putting some of what he has said in laymen's terms (as was Charles' shoe
size example in explaining his view), I think that Charles is doing us a
favor - primarily because I think we are at the beginning, as opposed to
midway or the end, of knowing all of the theoretical calculations behind
this phenomenon.

Fran Goode Akridge

This thread:

• Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- the one size shoe/(haplotypemutation rate) fits all approach is not valid, imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
  • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- the one size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid, imo -- corrected URL link by (John Chandler)
    • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
      • RE: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- the one size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid, imo -- corrected URL link by "Whit Athey" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
          • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by (John Chandler)
            • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
            • RE: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- the one size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid, imo -- corrected URL link by "Terry Barton" <>
              • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- the one size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid, imo -- corrected URL link by (John Chandler)
      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by (John Chandler)
        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
          • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by (John Chandler)
            • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
              • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by (John Chandler)
                • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by Charles <>
                  • Calculating the observed mutation rate [was: Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates...] by (John Chandler)
                    • [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by (John Chandler)
                        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates -- theone size shoe/(haplotype mutation rate) fits all approach is not valid,imo -- corrected URL link by "robert mclaren" <>
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by
                        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>
                          • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>

                        • RE: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by "Fran Akridge" <>

                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Ruy Cardoso <>
                        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by
                        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>
                        • Slander? by "Eric Olson" <>
                          • Book Review, Not Slander by "Ken Forbes" <>
                          • Re: [DNA] Slander? by
                            • RE: [DNA] Slander? by "Mark MacDonald" <>
                          • RE: [DNA] Slander? by
                          • Re: [DNA] Slander? by "G. O'Flannagain" <>
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Gordon Hamilton <>
                        • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by "Phil Goff" <>
                          • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by Charles <>
                      • Re: [DNA] Male Line Specific Y-STR Average Mutation Rates by