GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: charles <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Labmerge Project Update - Now up to 56 YSTR Markers - 54DYS and 2 DYF via 11 testing orgs
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:36:52 -0400
References: <434F3DDA.9000108@kerchner.com> <434FDD2D.4050104@kerchner.com> <011b01c5d0e7$778d2a10$9596893e@Masterbedroom>
In-Reply-To: <011b01c5d0e7$778d2a10$9596893e@Masterbedroom>

Gareth:

Yes you are right. Good eye. That was a typo. I had it right in my
comments, comment 17, but made a typo in the data table. Thanks for
pointing it out. The correct extended values for me at DYS464a,b,c,d are
15c, 15c, 16c, 16g.

I have corrected the page and uploaded it. Here is the link:
http://www.kerchner.com/labmerge.htm

Thanks again.

Charles Kerchner
http://www.kerchner.com/dna-info.htm

wrote:
> Charles
> could you please confirm your DYS464 results. Your page shows your FTDNA
> results as 15-15-16-16 but Biotix/DNA-FP as 15c-15c-15c-16g. Should the
> third 15c be a 16c?
>
> Gareth

This thread:

• Labmerge Project Update - 54 DYS Markers by charles <>
  • Re: [DNA] Labmerge Project Update - Now up to 56 YSTR Markers - 54DYS and 2 DYF via 11 testing orgs by charles <>
    • Re: [DNA] Labmerge Project Update - Now up to 56 YSTR Markers - 54 DYS and 2 DYF via 11 testing orgs by <>

      • Re: [DNA] Labmerge Project Update - Now up to 56 YSTR Markers - 54DYS and 2 DYF via 11 testing orgs by charles <>

    • DYF markers by "David F Reynolds" <>
      • Re: [DNA] DYF markers by <>
        • Re: [DNA] DYF markers by charles <>
        • Re: [DNA] DYF markers by Thomas Krahn <>
          • Re: [DNA] DYF markers and marker naming standards by charles <>
        • Re: [DNA] DYF markers by Thomas Krahn <>
  • Re: [DNA] Labmerge Project Update - 54 DYS Markers by
  • Re: [DNA] Labmerge Project Update - Now up to 56 YSTR Markers - 54 DYS and 2 ... by