GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:46:04 EST

In a message dated 02/11/06 12:42:17 PM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:

> Following are the gene diversity and mutation rates taken from the SMGF web
> site and from the poster that Ann mentions. The correlation between the two
> is 0.75.

Thanks for compiling that. To be intellectually honest, I should have made a
prediction about the correlation I expected before you came up with a number,
but that is certainly in the range I would have guessed.

Ann Turner

This thread:

• Sorenson Marker Details by jim berry <>
  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by Doug McDonald <>
  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by
    • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by
    • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by Doug McDonald <>
  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by "Leo W. Little" <>
    • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by "grandcross" <>

  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by

  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by
  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by Bonnie Schrack <>
    • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by Doug McDonald <>
    • HUMPHREY y-STR Markers_R1b by "Rex Johnson" <>
      • RE: [DNA] HUMPHREY y-STR Markers_R1b by "John McEwan" <>
        • RE: [DNA] HUMPHREY y-STR Markers_R1b by "Rex Johnson" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by Bonnie Schrack <>
    • Re: [DNA] Sorenson Marker Details by Doug McDonald <>
  • Re: Sorenson Marker Details by jim berry <>
    • Re: [DNA] Re: Sorenson Marker Details by Doug McDonald <>