TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM-L ArchivesArchiver > TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM > 2010-01 > 1264270984
From: "Elissa Scalise Powell, CG" <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] BCG Standard #1
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:23:04 -0500
I accept the proposed guidelines and vote for Harold to keep the discussion
BCG Standard 1 seems like common courtesy but still needs to be stated as
the funny thing about common courtesy is that it may not be common. Pointing
out the responsibility of each of us as the middle link in the chain between
past and future is important. We should not knowingly harm, or let harm,
anything in our possession or usage. It is respect for our future
generations so that they may see what we have seen.
Elissa Scalise Powell, CG
CG and Certified Genealogist are Service Marks of the Board for
Certification of Genealogists, used under license by board certificants
after periodic evaluations by the Board.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: On Behalf Of Harold Henderson
> Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 11:22 AM
> Proposed guidelines for discussion:
> (1) Respectful disagreement is fine, personal comments are not.
> (2) Those who express strong opinions are expected to be willing and able
> explain themselves.
> The first 18 standards have to do with data collection. Number 1 reads, in
> "Materials (published, unpublished, microfilmed, photographic, and
> are handled with careful regard for their preservation and availability
> future researchers."
|Re: [TGF] BCG Standard #1 by "Elissa Scalise Powell, CG" <>|