TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM-L Archives

Archiver > TRANSITIONAL-GENEALOGISTS-FORUM > 2010-01 > 1264384875


From: "LBoswell" <>
Subject: Re: [TGF] BCG Standard #1
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2010 21:01:17 -0500
References: <3e2fba731001230821y3d8f747i57213ad10ef9bb42@mail.gmail.com><3e2fba731001231113h54da9ae3r6c1a7ab56a42fcdc@mail.gmail.com><4B5BBA92.30007@carolina.rr.com><C8BCB9ACDC864461BAB81137B0222D84@acer511eba12df><34E2CE8FBBDB4E508B4230947DEE9EF5@ALISONOFFICE><DE5AF37D23B94853A0E32AEE8D2C6E1A@acer511eba12df><C30D8B5A4BCC45C9AC43D12C43A5EFE8@ALISONOFFICE>
In-Reply-To: <C30D8B5A4BCC45C9AC43D12C43A5EFE8@ALISONOFFICE>


sure, not a problem. Will do so tomorrow, but off list. Have a bit of
cleaning to do in the mean time

Larry
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alison Hare" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:31 PM
Subject: Re: [TGF] BCG Standard #1


> Larry
>
> I'm not aware of any records at LAC that are accessible on both microfilm
> and as originals. If you could provide a specific reference, I would be
> most interested.
>
> Thank you,
> Alison
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: LBoswell
> To:
> Sent: Sunday, January 24, 2010 1:19 PM
> Subject: Re: [TGF] BCG Standard #1
>
>
> typo: didn't mean to say it should be withdrawn whether or not there are
> microfilm copies or not. That would raise another question. What if the
> material is becoming damaged, but yet hasn't been filmed or digitized.
> Should it continue to be left open to access, or should it be protected
> until it can be filmed/copied?
>
> But Allison, I just checked again to see if there had been changes of
> late,
> but I still see both text and microfilm copies simultaneously available
> for
> various records? Some may be unavailable at the moment while
> "descriptive
> purposes" process is ongoing, but I see no signs that they won't be
> available again (the text and microfilm copies have been available
> together
> as long as I can remember).
>
> I wasn't referring to 'withdrawn material' at all. Sorry if I caused
> you
> to check unnecessarily, but I reread my post and I think it clearly says
> original material that has also been microfilmed, and where that's the
> case
> the researcher should choose to look at the microfilm only rather than
> the
> text document.
>
> Larry
>
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word
> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the
> message
>
> -------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to
> with the word
> 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the
> message

This thread: